You are given two sentences. You have to find if there is entailment or agreement of the Hypothesis by the Premise. From the given pair of sentences, you should identify if there is enough information in the Premise to support the claim made in the Hypothesis. The Premise may not exactly be the same as Hypothesis. Your task is to return 'entails' if the premise supports hypothesis else return 'neutral'.

[Q]: Premise: Even though so-called proponents of environmental laws are always talking about how they want regulation to be based on sound science, they're the same people who don't want all the regulations adopted after scientific study to be enforced. 
 Hypothesis: In science, something that always applies under the same conditions is called a scientific law.
[A]: neutral


[Q]: Premise: The area of land that contributes water to a river network upstream of a given point on a river is called the drainage basin, or watershed, of the river at that point. 
 Hypothesis: All of the land drained by a river system is called its basin, or the "wet" term  watershed
[A]: entails


[Q]: Premise: Owing to the disintegration of atoms always resulting in protons and electrons, the theory was established that the atoms were composed of protons and electrons. 
 Hypothesis: Electrons always result in an anion that is larger than the parent atom.
[A]:
neutral